Energy Outlook

By: Jacob Kim

To ensure the survival of our planet for future generations, supporting Kamala Harris in the upcoming election is essential. Climate change is an existential crisis that threatens to devastate the Earth, yet many on the opposing side fail to acknowledge its reality, dismissing it as mere “propaganda.” The Biden-Harris administration, although moderate by environmentalist standards, has made significant strides toward combating the climate crisis—much more than the previous Trump administration or any potential future administration under Donald Trump.

A key achievement of the Biden-Harris team is the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act, which has set the stage for reducing carbon emissions and promoting sustainable energy sources. In stark contrast, Trump’s administration systematically rolled back environmental regulations and is poised to dismantle critical climate policies like the Inflation Reduction Act if reelected. Trump has also propagated misleading claims about renewable energy, such as wind turbines harming wildlife, including eagles and whales. This rhetoric undermines clean energy solutions that are essential to transitioning away from fossil fuels.

Despite being endorsed by figures like Elon Musk, CEO of the world’s largest electric vehicle company, Trump has consistently championed “Drill, baby, drill,” advocating for increased hydraulic fracturing (fracking) and domestic oil production. This position clashes with the urgent need to diversify America’s energy sources to mitigate climate change. His proposed tariffs, intended to bolster economic independence, reflect a fundamental misunderstanding of economic principles; rather than protecting American consumers, such tariffs often lead to increased prices and strain the economy.

Choosing to expand oil production flies in the face of what climate scientists and experts recommend for long-term environmental stability. America needs to lead by example in investing in clean, renewable energy sources—not doubling down on fossil fuels.

While Jill Stein and other third-party candidates may present robust environmental platforms, a vote for them risks splitting the progressive vote, ultimately aiding Trump’s campaign. The reality is that third-party candidates are unlikely to win the presidency, making a vote for them a vote that could pave the way for Trump’s return to office.

For those who care about taking meaningful action on climate change and protecting the planet for future generations, voting for Kamala Harris is the most pragmatic choice. Her administration will continue to support policies that strive to mitigate climate change, safeguard the environment, and promote a sustainable future.